Monday, June 17, 2013

Kenyan Police Shoot Suspected Al-Shabab Supporter

Kenyan Police Shoot Suspected Al-Shabab Supporter


MOMBASA, KENYA — Kenyan police said on Monday they had shot dead a suspected supporter of the Somali militant group al-Shabab during a gunfight and said he had been plotting attacks in the country.

Kenya has suffered a series of grenade and gun attacks since it sent troops into neighboring Somalia in October 2011 in pursuit of insurgents it blames for kidnapping security personnel and Western tourists from its territory.

The attacks, which have targeted the capital Nairobi, Kenya's Indian Ocean coastline and its frontier with Somalia, have rattled investors and tourists in east Africa's biggest economy.

Police shot the suspect, Kassim Omollo, after he defied orders to surrender during a dawn raid on a house in the port city of Mombasa and instead returned fire, senior police officer Thomas Sangut said.

Police confiscated a sniper lens, two grenades, an AK 47 rifle, a pistol, more than 200 rounds of ammunition and an assortment of improvised explosive devices at the property, Sangut said.

The suspect was an al-Shabab trainer and bomb making expert whom police had been trailing for more than a year, police said.

"He has been changing residence all the time. Today we would trace him in Kenya, tomorrow we would hear he is in Somalia. He is the main man who has been behind the radicalizing and training of Kenyan youth in Somalia," Sangut said.

"We had information that he had come back here to plan terrorist attacks in Mombasa and Nairobi," Sangut said.

Al-Shabab, which is linked to al-Qaida and wants to impose a strict version of Islamic law across Somalia, could not be reached to comment on whether Omollo was in their ranks.

Al-Shabab has been substantially weakened in the last two years, losing Mogadishu and swathes of central and southern Somalia to Kenyan troops fighting under an African force.

But the rebels have managed to mount low-level raids across the border with Kenya.

Somaliland has been beaten and betrayed by her own

Somaliland has been beaten and betrayed by her own 
By Ibrahim Mead

Leaders are trusted servants of the people. When they betray that trust they become betrayers. There is a dark empty hole in the heart of the betrayers. They become sinners “Their crime is of such enormity that it will deprive them of divine mercy and the Prophet’s intercession. On the Day of Judgment, every traitor would be raised carrying the flag of his betrayal. A caller will cry out from the vast arena of judgment, pointing to him, drawing attention to him” (Xadeeth)

Betrayal is defined as “the violation of a presumptive contract, trust that produces moral and psychological conflict within a relationship amongst individuals, between organizations or between people and their governments. Betrayal is a complete break from previously decided upon or presumed norms by one party from the other.
” Someone who betrays that contract and that trust is commonly called a betrayer.”
Betrayal is devastating and the reason that betrayal is most devastating is because most often it is a loss that didn’t have to occur. It only happens because of someone’s deliberate hurtful behavior, or their carelessness, or their own personal weakness.

Islamic view of betrayal:

Islam views cheating, deception as a betrayal and they are considered as heinous sins, a source of shame to the guilty party committed them, both in this world and hereafter. The Prophet, (scws), did not merely denounce them by excluding them from the Muslim community in this world; he also announced that the shame of traitors will be immense. “Those who thought that their betrayal had been forgotten will find it right there, exposed for the whole world to see on banners raised high held by their own hands!

Every traitor will have a banner on the Day of Resurrection and it will be said: This is the betrayer of so-and-so.” (Saheeh Al-Bukhari) Their shame will increase even more when they meet with the Prophet of Mercy, the advocate of the sinners on that terrifying and horrible Day.The Prophet of Islam said: “God said: There are three whom I will oppose on the Day of Resurrection: a man who gave his word and then betrayed it; a man who sold a free man into slavery and kept the money; and a man who hired someone, benefited from his labor, and then did not pay his wages.” (Saheeh Al-Bukhari)

In this context it is the heads of the three branches of government in Somaliland who betrayed their trust. It is the trio, the president of the Republic, the chairman of the expired House of Representatives and the chair man of the expired, unelected body called Guurti. They collectively violated the presumptive contract with the people. The two chairmen of the respective houses of congress ceased to serve the people long time ago; they instead serve the executive body for their own personal benefits. Some have their allegiance with their clan more than they have with the country that pays them The executive body transformed the government of (the many) the people in to an oligarchy entity! (A Government by the few)

Conclusion:

I think Mr.Siilanyo and his aids think that admitting their wrongs and expressing remorse or sorrows are signs of weakness. They don’t want to appear weak so they act callously, and ignore the problem totally! That is what they are doing now! They are using our kids with guns to kill the innocent citizens. That is abuse and misuse of power.
Is there a chance that Siilanyo is as miserable as the people he betrayed, but unable or unwilling to admit it, and that he will die with it? Chances are he’s not! Maybe he is simply shallow and self-involved, without the capacity for deeper understanding of what he did, knowingly or otherwise and the effects of his acts. Either way I think Mr. Siilanyo should try to stop dwelling on this ungodly situation. He must learn what he can from (betrayal) his evil acts whether intentional or otherwise so he doesn’t repeat this sin again and again, moreover he better not let this incident-how sinful it is- harden his heart or make him reluctant to reach out again. People who do not value trust enough to respect it in the first place more often than not engage this pattern of repeat offender cycle.
Mr. Siilanyo better make this tragedy a teachable moment and move on, but only after confession and atonement, not with out them.

The President better address the disaster imbued from his betrayal and from the acts of his amateur act-first-then-think-later Ministers. He must seek forgiveness and move on, that is if he is there. That is if he believes atonement and forgiveness



People are not united, they are divided. Some are even targeted. The nation’s house is in disarray. It is crumbling and it ought to be intervened before it comes down! It is indeed crumbling on the heads of the trio but they don’t see it! They better change what is in their selves to see it They must seek forgiveness from Allah then from the people of Somaliland- only then they can move Somaliland forward. They can not do that by lying and living in a world of fantasy! I hope they are there to make this move.

Confession, atonement and renewal are the ways for word if the trios do understand that!



What is the role of the people in this tragedy?

It is your country which you shed blood and paid all your treasure that has been betrayed. It is your most sacred thing. It is your self and personality that has been demeaned and diminished. It is your identity and persona that has been carelessly and shamelessly dragged and tarnished. What the trio have done to Somaliland burns deep inside you. You loose sleep for the anger, the shock and the disappointment. You may find yourself still not believing it’s happened to you and to your country. But it has!
When those we have entrusted with our vote, our country and our loyalty betray us, we feel desecrated deep inside. We question whether we can ever recover from this. But we must recover from this by confronting the betrayers and cause change by utilizing the power of persuasion, and persistence. It is our right. it is the country we founded.
It is at this moment of realization, that you will make some of the most important decisions of your entire life, rather than on your bitterness and anger. If you dwell on your anger of what they have done to Somaliland it will consume all of your creative energy and thinking, the energy and vision that you will need to come up with your next move. Don’t be trapped with anger, confusion and hopelessness. Don’t let this misery swallow you up. Take Somaliland in to a safe shore. Don’t wait any more.

“Allah knows the man who means mischief from the man who means good.” (Ayah)
Strict probity is demanded of man but if he falls short of it man is told that he can not escape Allah’s punishment even though he may evade human punishment. “Those who want to change (nicmatu Allah) the good granted to them, they will not only encounter the anger of the people but they receive the wrath of Allah whose punishment is severe. In my judgment those are the ones who have forgotten or marginalized the founders of the 2nd Republic of Somaliland and instead heralded and spent the people’s money on the haters of the Republic. Those are the betrayers of Somaliland. Those are the rulers!! They also made the people punch of idiots in the process!

“Who ever persevere as we did before and stand on his ground as we did before, as far as Somaliland independence is concerned, and believes that noble cause which we paid blood and treasure, grasped the most trust worthy hand hold that never breaks.

The end belongs to the righteous

However peace and prayers
Ibrahim Mead



Saturday, June 15, 2013

CENTRAL AND EASTERN AFRICA: IRIN weekly humanitarian round-up 687 14 June 2013


 IRINnews logo
humanitarian news and analysis
a service of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs


Ten ways to save a million lives

lead photo
LONDON, 10 June 2013 (IRIN) - In London on 8 June, UK Prime Minister David Cameron, together with an array of presidents, prime ministers, businesspeople and philanthropists, signed the Global Nutrition for Growth Compact, an agreement to improve the nutrition of children and pregnant women around the world. Inside the meeting room, organizers said they had secured new commitmentsof up to US$4.15 billion to tackle undernutrition between now and 2020; outside, in Hyde Park, activists laid a carpet of flower petals to represent the lives of children lost each year through malnutrition.
Read report online

Hunger drives hunt for gold in South Sudan's east

lead photo
NANAKANAK, 10 June 2013 (IRIN) - Around 60,000 people are thought to be mining gold in South Sudan, using the bare hands they once used to harvest crops. In the new nation's east, where poor rains have caused widespread hunger, women, children and the elderly have joined the hordes of people seeking their fortune through this back-breaking labour.
Read report online

Thousands still missing HIV treatment following CAR coup

lead photo
KAMPALA, 11 June 2013 (IRIN) - More than 15,000 people living with HIV in the Central African Republic (CAR) had their life-prolonging antiretroviral (ARV) treatment interrupted as a result of the instability before, during and after the 24 March coup by the Séléka rebel group. NGOs are now struggling to ensure these people resume their regimens to reduce the risk of illness, drug resistance and death.
Read report online

Uganda running out of ARVs, HIV test kits

lead photo
KAMPALA, 12 June 2013 (IRIN) - Uganda has run out of most antiretroviral drugs (ARVs), HIV testing kits, drugs to treat opportunistic infections and several crucial diagnostic tools for HIV care, according to a recent Ministry of Health stock status report.
Read report online

Calls for AU, UN to take action in Sudan's Blue Nile State

lead photo
NAIROBI, 12 June 2013 (IRIN) - The UN and the African Union must step forward and take decisive action to stop Sudan from committing war crimes against civilians in Blue Nile State, says a new Amnesty International report, dismissed as "false" by Khartoum.
Read report online

Intellectual property reprieve for poor countries

lead photo
NAIROBI, 13 June 2013 (IRIN) - Least developed countries (LDCs) will continue to have access to affordable medical technologies for an additional extra eight years before they are required to implement the World Trade Organization's Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property (TRIPS) Agreement, following a series of negotiations.
Read report online

Call for "no regret" climate adaptation strategies*

lead photo
JOHANNESBURG, 14 June 2013 (IRIN) - The absence of accurate climate prediction models should not dissuade countries from choosing the best ways to adapt to a changing climate, says a new report published in the Proceedings of the National Academies of Sciences.
Read report online



Sunday, June 9, 2013

DIMUQURAADIYAD; Dawlad Masuul Ah Oo Dadka Matasha Q2- Ahmed Arwo



Dawlad Masuul Ah Oo Dadka Matasha Q2 
By
Ahmed Arwo

Salaan iyo nabadi korkiina ha ahaato. Assalaamu calaykum wa raxmatullaah wa barakaatu. Waa qormadii labaad ee geedi-socodka dimuquraadiyadda furan ee adduun weynaha. Ujeedada socdaalkeena taariikheed waa inaynu dhabadii la soo maray dib u qaadno, si aynu daawo ugu helno xanuunada aafeeyey nidaamka aynu indho la'aan u qaadanay.

Nidaamkii islaamka ee Rasuulkeena SCWS iyo khulafadu dhagax-dhigeen waxuu ku dhisnaa talo-wadaag , hogaanka la doorto ee aanu ahayn mid dhaxaltooyo.

Waxuuna fure u ahaa dimuquraadiyadda dhabta ah. Waxuu wiiqmay kolkii loo bedelay nidaam boqortooyo oo qoys keli ku noqday awoodii dawladnimo. Anigoo marar kale soo booqan doono dibu dhaca horumar dawladeedka ee Islaamka oo talo boobku udub-dhexaad ka tahay, waxaan manta eegi doonaa sifaha dimuquraadiyadda iyo bilowgii ay dalkan Britan ay soo martay. Waxayna ay iftiimin doontaa hawlo badan oo loo soo maray iyo habka looga baxay, iyadoo ay mar walba hogganka u haysay halganka iyo foojignaanta dadweynaha oo xaqooda hadh iyo habeen u soo jeeday, diiday duudsiga oo doortay caddaalad iyo horumar. Kolna fikradda talo-wadaag kamay iman inta talada haysay, kamay iman dhul-qabeenkii shaqaalaha ula dhaqmi jiray sida addoonta, kamay iman boqor iyo amiir dagaal, kamay iman dilaal siyaasadda ku qabaanta.

Nidaamka loo yaqaan dimuquraadiyadda furan (Liberal democracy) waxa lala xidhiidhiyaa hab-maamul siyaasadeed oo ku soo biyo shubta dhismo dawladnimo oo ay hageyso mas'uuliyad iyo talo wadaag. Waxa taasi lid ku tahay nidaamka keli-taliska oo ku salaysan awood sheegad iyo maquunin. Waxa nidaamkan cadaaladda ka durugsan ka mid ah nidaamka askarinimo oo ku yimaadda inqilaab, boqortooyo aan sharci xakamayn, dalaka shuuciga ah ee talada xisbi keliye hayo. Waxa iyana soo raacda nidaamada Afrika iyo Carabta ee dimuquraadiga sheegta bal se aan marna diyaar u ahayn in dawladda doorasho sharci ah lagaga badiyo. Waxa mataal loo qaadan karaa Masar oo marwalba doorasho ka dhacdo, bal se ka fog mid ku socota nidaam dimuquraadi ah.

Innagoo maqaalkan isku dayi doono inaan dib u jaleecno kufka iyo guclada lagu hanatay in la helo dawlad masuul ah oo dadka matasha, maantana aynu isku koobi doono guud mar ku kooban Habka Matalaada amba Wakiilnimada ay dalkan Britan soo martay, aynu sadaro gaaban ku sheegno taariikho muhiim ah oo dalkani soo maray oon dhaafsanayn odhaah mawduuca inoo furta. Waayo waa mawduuc mug weyn oo shahaadadu sare lagu qaato, umana jeedno inaan isu dhigno taariikhda Britan bal se waa mid aynu wax kala baxayno, si aan dimuquraadiyadeena curdinka ah daawo uga doono siday bilowgii ku dabiibeen.

Dalka Ingiriiska (England), ayaa ah dalkii ugu horeeyey ee barlamaan la doorto laga hirgeliyey sanadkii 1265, waxaana taasi dabo socotay nidaam gole guurti oo la taliyaal ahaa oo uu la yimid boqorkii William of Normandy 1066. Waxa 1535-42 la qabsaday Wales oo toos loogu daray England. Xiliyadaas waxa jiray boqortooyo gooni ah oo ka jirtay Scotland iyo mid kale oo ka jirtay isku jirka jasiiradda Ireland. 1701 waxa israacay England iyo Scotland, baarlamankoodana waxa lagu mideeyey axdigii israaca ee 1707 (Act of Union). Taas waxa ka dhashay barlamanka loo yaqaanay Barlamanka Britanka Weyn amba (Great Britain Parliament). Waxa xigtay in Ireland iyana soo raacday Britan sanadkii 1801 oo la unkay barlamaanka loo yaqaanay Barlamanka Boqaortooyada Midowday (United Kingdom Parlaiament) Kolka ay Ireland xoriyad qaadatay sanadkii 1922, waxa ka hadhay Gobalka Waqooyiga oo u badan dad Britan ka soo jeeda oon Kaatoli ahayn (Catholic), waxa dhashay Barlamanka manta jira oo sanadkii 1927 loo bixiyey Barlamanka Boqortooyada Midowday ee Britanta Weyne iyo Waqooyiga Ireland. (Parliament of United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland} .


Matalaadda amba Wakiilnimada


Waxa cabasho dadweynahu qarniyo kaga cabanayeen iyo halgankii ay soo mareen halkan ku soo qaadimeyno. Waxaa se aynu eegeynaa bal sida taxadurka leh ee ay uga doodeen uguna xal raadiyeen bal siday ku soo xulayaan cid matasha oo Gole barlamaan ugu noqota. Waxa dooda ugu horeysaa ahayd inaan marna la dhisin nidaam awoodda dalku qof keliya ku soo uruurto. Waxa taasi keentay inaan amuurtu noqon in boqorka amba madaxweyne keliya la doorto, ee ay tahay in la helo tiro macquul ah oo degaanada iyo bulsho weynta matasha oo awoodda xukunka badh boqorka ka qaada, weliba u dejisa xeer ay ku xakameeyaan. Waxa meesha socday dood cilmiyeed ay horseed ka yihiin jaamacadaha iyo saxaafaddu oo lagu bandhigaayo baahida loo qabo iyo habka ay ku shaqaynayaan. 

Garashada ah inaan awodda ruux keliya lagu miisin, ayaa ah tan ay ka dhalatay kala xadeynta awoodaha dawladda ee xadka loo kala xayday hawlaha Golaha Fulinta oo xiligaas boqortooyada ahaa, Golaha Sharcidejinta iyo Golaha Garsoorka.

Waxaa se hawsha kala xadeynta loo xil saaray Golaha Wakiilada, iyadoon dalkan Britan lahayn distoor gooni ka ah sharciyada ay dejiyaan Wakiiladu. Taasi waxay ahmiyad gaara siisay Golaha Wakiilada (House of Commons) iyo kan Guurtiga (House of Lords) oo bilowgii awoodda sharci dejinta qayb ka ahaa.

Waxa doodu fadhiisatay sida loo helaayo sawir bulshadu dhammaan iska dhex aragto oo lagu unko gole barlamaan. Kolkii leysla gartay in gobaladu ka dhex muuqdaan, ayaa waxa meesha soo gashay in arrintaas ay ka faa'ideysteen maal qabeenkii iyo dhul qabeenkii iyo amiiradii dagaalka (knights). Taas oo muddo yarba ay ka biyo diideen bulsho weyntii u badneyd xoogsatada. Waxa bilaabmay mudahaarado ay ka shiidaal qaateen dhaqdhaqaaqii Maraykanku xoriyadda iyo dimuquraadiyada ku doonaayey, iyo kacdoonkii ka socday Farnce ,Italy iyo Yurubta kale bilowgii qarniga 18naad.

Waxa taasi dhalisay in la helo sifo baarlamanku ka koobnaado cid matasha xoogsatada iyo beeraleyda oo gaar loogu daayo xulashadoodo. Sidoo kale ayaa loo qaybiyey qaybaha shaqooyinka kale sida ganacsiga, karaaniyaasha, macalamiinta iyadoo fiiro gaar ah lagu eegay jaamacadaha, aqoonyahanada iyo qorayaasha iyo saxaafadda.

Si loo sabaaleeyo awoodda boqortooyada iyo taageerayaashoodu ay luminayaan, waxa loo gartay in la sameeyo laba Gole mid ah kan Guurtida ( House of Lords) iyo kan dadweynahu doortaan (House of Commons), iyadoo awoodda Golaha Guurtida lala dabo taagnaa in marwalba la yareeyo ilaa ay noqdeen dar aan go,aan lahayn, bal se ku kooban talo bixin iyo inay Golaha Wakiilada ku celiyaan sharciyo sixid iyo dib u eegid u baahan, laakiin isma hortaagi karaan mar labaad haddii Wakiiladu sharciga u foodaan. Waxa isla markiiba laga saaray in awoodda miisaaniyadda iyo arrimaha lacagta laga xauubiyo Guurtida oo is hortaagtay miisaaniyaddii 1912 oo lagu kordhinaayey cashuurta dhulka iyagoo guurtidu u badnayd Dhul-qabayaal. Waxayna taasi horseed u noqotay sharciyo badan oo awoodda Guurtida soo gaabiyey.

Waxa iyana doodu ka taagnayd sida Wakiiladu hawshooda u fulinayaan. Ma waxay noqdaan sida garyaqaanada iyo safiirada oo si toos ah uga amar qaata cidda ay matalayaan, mise waxay noqdaan dar danta guud ee dalka u darban. Waxa qoraalo tiro badan laga qoray arrintan. Lama iloobi karo kaalinta uu arrintan ka qaatay mufakirka iyo qoraaga weyne ee Mr. Algermon Sidney oo naftiisa ku waayey halganka uu u soo galay xorriyadda qofka iyo nidaamka dimuquraadiga ah, isagoo kurka laga jaray sandkii 1692. Waxa la yaab leh in lix sano ka dib 1698 la daabacay buugiisa caanka ah ee (Discourses Concerning Government). Taana waxa dhaliyey inaan marna halgankiisu is taagin ilaa laga midho dhaliyey geeridiisa dabadeed. Waxuu Sidney tilmaam dheer ka bixiyey baahida loo qabo madaxbanaanida wakiilka si loo helo barlamaan danta guud ka hawl gala. Ma aha in talo kasta oo uu gaadhaayo ay hadhayso baqdin uu ka baqaayo cidda la xisaabtami doonta oo noqonaysa qabiil, xisbi amba koox, iyagoon sugeyn muddada uu xilka hayo.

Sidaas darteed waxay ku biyo cabtay in Wakiilka loo daayo xoriyadda uu maankiisa la kaashado waxuu u arako danta guud, waayo sharciyada ay soo gudbiyaan, kuma koobna cidda dooratay. Waa se inay ka war hayaan dareenka cidda ay matalayaan oo ay la wadaagaan warbixin iyo talo-qaadasho. Marna se laguma leh la xisaabtan dhaafsiisan cabasho, eedeyn, canbaareen iyo u bogid loo mariyo warbaahinta, inta ay xilka hayaan. Waxa se xisaabtu imanaysaa kolka doorasho soo gasho, oo taladu mar labaad si toos ah ugu soo noqoto gacanta shacbiga. Wakiilka loo bogaana noqdo mid dib loo doorto, kan laga biyo diidaana la tuso albaabka furan.

Ciddii awoodda shacbiga sida xooga badan u aaminsanayd waxay soo jeediyeen in Golahu noqdo mid cimrigiisu dhaafsanayn sanad, si la xisaabtanka shacbigu noqdo mid mar walba maskaxda wakiilka ka bixin. Sidoo kale waxa la yidhi ha noqdaan dar aan lacag qaadan. Waxa laga baqay in dawladdu noqoto mid lacag bixinta ku laaluushta wakiilada. Tani waxay keentay in barlamaanka ay galaan rag ay ka dhab tahay inay dejiyaan sharci ummadda dhaqa qarniyo badan, oon cidna u habran, cidna ka aar goosan.Bilowgii barlamaan waxuu ku bilaabmay sidaas.

Waxa habka matalaadda iyana loo soo maray nidaamo kala duwan oo la xidhiidha sida loo helaayo codbixin bulshadu ku dhantay kuna kalsoontay. Hawl yari laguma helin nidaamka HAL COD IYO HAL QOF ( One man one vote). Waayo taas lafteeda ayaan loo arkeyn inay xiligii kala guurka ku habbooneed dhisme qaran u hayaamay dimuquraadiyadda furan. Aaan qalinka ku joojo qodobkan oo aynu maqaalka kan xiga ku eegi doono. Nidaamka hal cod iyo hal qof waxuu u baahanyahay in bulshadu leedahay aqoon ay ku qiimeyso cidda tartameysa iyo barnaamajyada ay la yimaadaan. Waana mid dariiq dheer iyo sifooyin kala duwan loo soo maray. Noocyo kale duwan ayeyna eegi oo la soo maray.

Waa inoo maqaal kale iyo fakir aan idinla wadaago Insha Allah.

Ahmed Arwo
La-taliyaha Madaxweynaha ee Dhaqaalaha,Ganacsiga,
iyo Maalgashiga

https://www.facebook.com/aharwo?ref=tn_tnmn

Hargeysa
samotalis@gmail.com

http://samotalis.blogspot.com/


--
Posted By Blogger to SAMOTALIS at 6/09/2013 07:31:00 PM

Thursday, June 6, 2013

Prof. Samatar: Somaliland’s Arch foe in Hargaysa But How?


Prof. Samatar: Somaliland’s Arch foe in Hargaysa But How?

By Abdirahman Mohamed Dirye

Prof. Samatar has been waging crusade war and political sabotage against Somaliland in one-third of his lifetime and has been taking advantage of Somaliland political vulnerability. He has inbuilt hatred against Somaliland, thus; he spent 14 hours a day minimum to sabotage the hard-sought cause of about 3.5 million people talking to his graduate students and global audience about that Somaliland is simply a fantasy of one deluded tribe— who unsuccessfully tried to impose others of their nonsense on the tip of SNM’s gunpoint. In fact, he did great damage to Somaliland during which impossible to reverse. He cannot, so he does not deserve a welcome. People should turn their backs to him and that is best option. His conversion from his cult to Somaliland is yet uncertain.

Burco-online showed video clip was indeniable fact that prof. Samatar’s furious decline of Somaliland’s national flag cap offer by Somalilander in Timacadde University! His rejection is strong evidence of his faith retain but slow dancing with what Engineer Faysal Ali Warabe called “local jaahilin or ignorant” .

“I came here to observe” (of how my cruel campaign affected millions of unfortunate people back home) but what else is he observing rather than that? His return to Somaliland after four decades in self-imposed exile from Somaliland/ Somalia followed president Silanyo’s face to face meeting of updating him of how far the circumstances has changed. The President explained to the Professor that Mujahidins in today’s Somaliland’ Hirsi Politics is referred to people of Kulmiya fans at the time of the presidential election who were rioters and other criminals, not the Mujahidins with the Diaspora’s mind who upset you, people who burn tyres in violation of peace and thrown stones at the law enforcement agencies are my favorite Mujahidins. Who cares about lazybones wandering in burning Hargaysa’s streets aimlessly and talking about past guerilla fairytales?

It took for Muj. Silanyo to dismantle and SNM remnants and for two decades, he ensnared Muj. Muse Bihi, Dhagaweyne, and Ahmed Mire and rendered unusable awaiting death alone.

President Silanyo said “my frequent mention of Mujahidins in the power-search era was rhetoric and I am paid a lip service to the poor orphans of SNM to be my vehicle to power, instead, the SNM orphans will welcome you with roses of all kinds from Berbara to Gabilay!” and immediately Samatar, a man fixated on the past episode and gone era that won’t return, recognized president’s startling statements and found out what he was told in back in the States was true when he arrived at Berbera airport; the Mujihadins that welcomed him at the airports were group of political thugs and former clean cut terrorists clearing of their crimes through a sham democracy of which they successfully hijacked to turn to Iranian’s theocracy style! Elections do not necessarily mean a system is a democratic, Iranian’s Khumeinis hold elections on yearly basis and that does not attract international legitimacy they desperately needed, Similarly, Somaliland’s Godanites hold it. It is just waste of time and money.

Geeljire, a blind critic of the credible Riyale-led- administration and Dr Abdilahi Omar, and an ex-social interpreter at the social ( probably an abortion?) centre for Somali women in the Netherlands with unwanted pregnancy and Birmingham municipality worker , ushered him and explained what Mujahidins actually are, so such shallow term won’t scare the chauvinistic unionists like Samatar because they are more unionist than him as they are Islamist unionists seeking the lost Caliphates of the Islamic world, that is good thing.



President Silanyo’s change of heart and double talk has brought Prof. Samatar, a former anti-Somaliland electronic ragtag militia ringleader, to Somaliland soil, Samatar’s union principle remains unchanged but bowing to the ground seems stunt, new phenomenon to fool bow lovers. Will smart people who have seen that movie before buy it? Only time will tell.

Dirye is a Somaliland activist, he can be reached at:

dirye@democracychronicles.com

Analysis: The dangers of rushing Mali elections

Analysis: The dangers of rushing Mali elections

DAKAR/BAMAKO, 6 June 2013 (IRIN) - As international donors, notably France and the USA, as well as the Economic Community of West African States, push for July presidential elections in Mali, critics say doing so could foment factionalization in the north thus further destabilizing it, threaten ongoing negotiations over Kidal town, and hamper reconciliation and dialogue. IRIN spoke to analysts, citizen activists and would-be voters to glean their views.

It is clear why certain outsiders are pushing for elections, said Jamie Bouverie in Africa Report: [ http://thinkafricapress.com/mali/premature-election-threatens-peace-and-stability ] France needs to put in place a legitimate authority to enable it to declare the Mali problem over; the US requires a democratically elected authority to restart its aid and investments; and the UN requires a legitimate partner for MINUSMA, its stabilization mission.

"Conducting elections is the only realistic way," said Paul Melly, associate fellow at think tank Chatham House. "If there were no restoration of democratic structures, the country would not get international aid and would struggle to cooperate with others countries."

Some Malians agree. Maimouna Dagnoko, a trader in Bamako, told IRIN: "The government must do all it can to hold these elections in July. Only through them can we put in place a legitimate authority which can take charge. The longer the transition government persists, the further we sink into the abyss."

But while all agree that elections are needed, many say rushing them will further destabilize Mali. Inter-communal violence, suicide attacks and roadside bombs recur in the north, while France plans to bring its troop count down to 1,000 (from 4,000 in April) by election month, creating a security vacuum, some say. While MINUSMA is set to fully deploy in July it will take time to establish itself.

"What makes elections highly complicated is the situation in the north - not only Kidal, which gets most of the attention, but in Ménaka, Gao and Timbuktu, which have not been sorted out," said Yvan Guichaoua, international politics lecturer at the University of East Anglia, mentioning the continuation of exactions against light-skinned people in parts of the north - inter-communal violence between the Movement for the National Liberation of Azawad (MNLA) and Arab fighters in Ber (Timbuktu Region) and Anefis (in Kidal Region). "Distrust between communities is still very high. Just think back to the 1992 national pact, which was ambitious but still led to three more years of communal violence."

The Kidal question remains controversial: Malian troops this week wrested control of Anefis, midway between Gao and Kidal town, as part of a military offensive that is assumed to aim to take back Kidal Region from the MNLA. This offensive will have stymied the Burkina Faso-led negotiations currently under way between members of the MNLA, the High Council of Azawad (formerly of MNLA and then Ansar Dine) and the Malian authorities.

No "game-changers"

One problem is that while the Bamako political landscape has changed a bit since the March 2012 military coup, newcomers have by and large not shown any more concern for addressing the country's core problems than their predecessors, said Guichaoua. "The godfathers of Malian politics are still in the game - there are no game-changers there," he told IRIN.

Elections must be a beginning not an end, he added. If they are rushed, then after them, the problems of alienation in the north, the collapse of the Malian state, an inability to provide quality basic services such as health and education, and impunity for abuses that took place both recently and in previous conflicts over the north, will all persist.

Truth and reconciliation

All analysts IRIN spoke to stressed the importance of community and national-level reconciliation and dialogue. "For generations, tensions between nomadic Tuaregs and other ethnic groups have caused deep wounds that can only be healed through a truth and reconciliation process," said academics Greg Mann and Bruce Whitehouse in a March article. [ http://allafrica.com/stories/201303131117.html ] "The scope of this process should not be restricted to events in northern Mali, but should encompass misdeeds committed throughout the country, including by the previous government and the soldiers who overthrew it a year ago."

But the Commission for Dialogue and Reconciliation (already set up) has yet to gain momentum, and its mandate is overly broad, said Guichaoua. Further, several communities, including the Bella and those represented by COREN [ http://maliactu.net/commission-dialogue-et-reconciliation-cdr-le-coren-exige-sa-recomposition/ ] (a northern Malian group calling for unity amid rebellion) do not recognize it.

One risk is that, once elected, no politician will want to adopt a transformative agenda that might destabilize their hold on power, he said.

The general feeling among many southern Malians is that they are tired of Tuareg rebellions, and have little appetite for further reconciliation moves, said University of Ghent history lecturer Baz Lecocq.

Mali has rarely done truth and reconciliation well, so there is a dearth of models to draw on. One successful attempt discussed at a gathering of Mali experts at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London last week [ http://www.soas.ac.uk/cas/events/conferences/mali---2013/file84419.pdf ] was in 1996 in Bourem in the Gao Region, where leaders from various communities joined forces to put an end to mutual distrust and violence. There are few present-day examples, though some community-level dialogue is going on in Burkina Faso's refugee camps, according to one analyst. "But just because there is no clear bottom-up approach at present, does not mean there should be a top-down one," said Guichaoua, "It is unlikely to reap long-term dividends."

Legitimacy

Election supporters say elections are the only way to restore some sort of legitimacy for Mali. "Elections will not solve everything. but not having a democratic process will not make it any easier," said Chatham House's Melly.

Elected officials have long struggled with legitimacy in Mali - both in the south and the north, where only 40 percent of the electorate on average turns out to vote, said Gregory Mann, lecturer in African studies at Columbia University in a blog conversation [ http://africanarguments.org/2013/05/14/mali-which-way-forward-a-chat-with-bruce-hall-baz-lecocq-gregory-mann-and-bruce-whitehouse/ ] with academics and Mali experts Bruce Whitehouse, Baz Lecocq and Bruce Hall. And this support for politicians grows weaker still when the state is unable to deliver basic services.

"We tend to think of this as a problem between Bamako and Kidal. but what seems much more problematic for the future is the fact that the health service collapsed, that the state completely delegitimized itself, and its infrastructure was destroyed in 2012," said Bruce Hall, who lectures on African history at Duke University in the USA.

International diplomats and local authorities should be wary of partial credibility, said Guichaoua. "Either you are legitimate or you are not. What if a candidate who has lost, tries to inflame the situation and argue elections have been manipulated or rigged. You need something serious if you don't want to pay the price afterward.

"Veneration for elections on the part of the international community has led to failures in the past. [he mentioned the Democratic Republic of Congo] "Why not wait a bit?. "We faced a pretty dramatic crisis over the past 15 months, and this could have been an eye-opening experience. If we let things go on as usual, what will the next crisis be?"

Logistics

Putting questions of security and sustainable peace aside, no one can agree if it is even feasible to hold elections in July. It is not an ideal month, given the start of the Ramadan fast, and the rains which will prevent many rural voters from participating - something that could lead northern pastoralists not to see the elections as legitimate. "Even under the best of circumstances, July is a terrible time for elections in Mali," said Baz Lecocq.

Much of the voting in villages in the north takes place through mobile voting booths, which would probably be blocked by the rains. "If you want low voter turnout, organize elections in July," he said, noting that July elections in the past have led to low voter turnout.

Figuring out a way to enable the 174,129 refugees in Burkina Faso, Niger and Mauritania to vote is crucial, said Guichaoua, not to mention the many unregistered refugees who are getting by in capital cities such as Ouagadougou, Niamey and Nouakchott. "How do you identify these people?" he asked.

The UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) will allow the Malian authorities to conduct voter registration in the camps on a voluntary basis, it said in a communiqué.

Youssouf Kampo, a member of the national independent election commission, is optimistic: "We are in full preparation. Materials are already in place, except in some parts of Timbuktu and Gao, where they were destroyed. Voting booths, ballot boxes, ink and others things are all in place. I believe we will succeed in time."

Gal Siaka Sangaré, a member of the government's General Office on Elections (DGE), told IRIN they are making progress towards biometric voter registration despite some technical glitches. "We have to respect the 28 July date and pray to God that it all works out," he said.

aj/ob/cb

[END]

From Clan Chiefs To Clan Committees

From Clan Chiefs To Clan Committees

Introduction

The Somali Society in general is strictly aligned along clan lines. This is the same for all Somalis wherever they live in the five Somali territories defined by the colonial powers. However, the role of the clan leadership varies from territory to territory. By and large, the clan chiefs' political role remained the most significant in the British Somaliland. This active role for the traditional leadership explains Somaliland's relative peace and stability after the Somali Republic collapsed in 1991. In the following lines, I try to shed some light on the historical role of the clan chiefs in Somaliland and the current trends.

The Historical Role of Clan Chiefs in the Somaliland Society

In the British Somaliland, the political role of the clan chiefs remained the most significant relative to the other Somali territories. Before the British arrived in Somaliland, the territory was inhabited by several clans who were ruled by clan chiefs. When the British arrived, they negotiated with the clan chiefs. The Somalilanders accepted the arrival of the British only after the British occupiers agreed to the treaty that was dictated by the clan chiefs. This treaty was written not on paper but on camel hides, since the clans feared that the paper would fade sooner and the treaty would be forgotten.

Unlike the Italians who invaded southern Somalia, the British were considerate enough not to try to by-pass the clan chiefs' authority during their rule over Somaliland. The British administrators preserved the traditional rule of the clan chiefs and ruled Somaliland through the clan chiefs; since they believed that it was the best way to govern the pastoral society. The clan chief had authority over his clan's territory and he was responsible for any "wrong doing" committed by any of his subjects against the British administration. On the other hand, the British favored some clan chiefs over the others. This could be considered as a source of administrative corruption on the part of the British rulers. Such a corruption led to tensions among the Somaliland clans and occasional clashes among them.

The British also introduced modern administrative structures into Somaliland by training and appointing Somalilanders into this system. The British could as well try to use this modern system and eliminate the role of the clan chiefs, but they did not do so. They knew that the tribal nature of the Somali society necessitated the institutionalization of the clan chiefs' role. They even paid the clan chiefs for being part of the modern-cum-traditional system of governance that they chose to rule Somaliland. I believe that the British did a favor for Somaliland, at least, in terms of their introduction of this unique system of governance.  This system is dominating Somaliland to this day.

The Situation over the Last 22 Years

The clan chiefs were the backbone of the movement that started in Somaliland in the early 1980s against the dictatorial rule of General Mohamed Siyad Barre. The Somali National Movement (SNM) was established by intellectuals from Somaliland both from the Diaspora and from within. However, SNM could not have done anything, had it not been for the collaboration of the clan chiefs. The clan chiefs took SNM mission as their own and they acted to recruit personnel for the movement. They also mobilized resources from internally and externally for the SNM.

The clan chiefs declared Somaliland as independent nation in their meeting in Buroa in May 1991. The Somali National Movement (SNM) only approved their decision. Hence, they played a catalyst role in the birth of Somaliland as a nation. The SNM was not a coherent organization and, therefore, after overseeing the birth of Somaliland, it did not last as an effective ruling party for long. Its chairman at the time, Mr. Abdirahman Ahmed Ali ruled Somaliland as president for about two years only. The clan chiefs organized a meeting in Borama town and Mr. Abdirahman was forced out of power in this clan chiefs' congress. The clan chiefs appointed Mr. Mohamed Ibrahim Egal as Somaliland's president.

The clan chiefs established Somaliland's upper house of parliament, which is the most important political institution in Somaliland. Every clan chief nominated his clan's representative into this house.

However, one aspect of the Somaliland clan chieftain over the last 22 years is not a positive development. The clan chiefs (or Suldans) simply became too many over the last 22 years. If their number was about 30 in 1991, currently they are around 100. Every sub-clan appointed several chiefs. As a result, their authority became diluted enormously. Clan problems that used to be solved by the Suldan within days are now taking months if they are resolved at all. Each chief would like the decision to be made by the other chief out of fear or out of respect for the other.

The Role of the Clan Committees

Somaliland now has all the modern state institutions that are required for administering the affairs of the state. However, the nation remains to be deeply tribal like other Somali societies. Critical issues affecting the relations among the different clans or the clan's relationship with the state are not decided without the involvement of at least some of the clan's many chiefs. The political decision makers might go along with their business in normal times, but in the event that anything goes wrong the clan chiefs become the critical players or problem resolvers.

On the other hand, the proliferation of the clan chiefs tempted most the clans to organize their own committees for the proper management of their clan's affairs. The educated clan members and businesspersons are usually appointed into these clan committees. Some clans created their committees much earlier than the other clans, while the other clans are catching up in the process. The clan committees might have existed in the past in the rural areas in an ad hoc manner to come together based on the appointment of the clan chief to assist him to decide on a particular clan issue. However, the modern day clan committees are not necessarily appointed by the clan chief. The current clan committees are urban in nature and the members come from either educational or business backgrounds. They are usually selected during a clan congress. The politicians are not usually welcome into these clan committees. The influence of these committees on the clan is stronger than the influence of any other structure, be it modern or traditional. These committees decide about the clans' social and political development.

Moreover, these clan committees are presumed to contribute to the peace and stability in Somaliland in general. Unlike the individualistic nature of the clan chief's decisions in the past, the committee's decisions are pluralistic in nature. Due to the fact that business people are represented in the clan committees, they are not supposed to decide in favor of violence or conflicts. In this way, the clan committees contribute to the peace and stability of their respective localities in particular and to the Somaliland nation in general. Similarly, these clan committees are expected to contribute to the socio-economic development of the country, since one of their prime responsibilities is to contribute to the educational development of their clans. Because Somaliland society is composed of clans, the educational development of one clan will contribute to the overall development of the country.

 

Abdirashid Ahmed Guleid